| Eli Manning | |
|
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
shakostud05
Posts : 69 Join date : 2008-02-03
| Subject: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:24 pm | |
| I am looking to trade Eli Manning.
I would like an upgrade in QB please. Offer away | |
|
| |
titansalltheway
Posts : 79 Join date : 2008-01-29
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 12:55 pm | |
| Vince Young?? wouldnt be cheap though | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 4:00 pm | |
| - shakostud05 wrote:
- I am looking to trade Eli Manning.
I would like an upgrade in QB please. Offer away Carson Palmer could be had, but you'd need to give up more than just a 1st |
|
| |
shakostud05
Posts : 69 Join date : 2008-02-03
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 4:03 pm | |
| - Ocho Cinco wrote:
- shakostud05 wrote:
- I am looking to trade Eli Manning.
I would like an upgrade in QB please. Offer away Carson Palmer could be had, but you'd need to give up more than just a 1st I could give you: Eli 1st and 3rd | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 4:05 pm | |
| - shakostud05 wrote:
- Ocho Cinco wrote:
- shakostud05 wrote:
- I am looking to trade Eli Manning.
I would like an upgrade in QB please. Offer away Carson Palmer could be had, but you'd need to give up more than just a 1st
I could give you: Eli 1st and 3rd Still not enough. Carson is a 97, Eli isn't a good QB. Prefer a player to a pick. |
|
| |
shakostud05
Posts : 69 Join date : 2008-02-03
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 4:08 pm | |
| - Ocho Cinco wrote:
- shakostud05 wrote:
- Ocho Cinco wrote:
- shakostud05 wrote:
- I am looking to trade Eli Manning.
I would like an upgrade in QB please. Offer away Carson Palmer could be had, but you'd need to give up more than just a 1st
I could give you: Eli 1st and 3rd Still not enough. Carson is a 97, Eli isn't a good QB. Prefer a player to a pick. Ok, well we could drop the 3rd round pick, and we could swap starting TE you get Shockey TE and ill get Kelly 81??? | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 4:10 pm | |
| So you'd do Eli, 1st and Shockey, for Palmer and Reggie? |
|
| |
shakostud05
Posts : 69 Join date : 2008-02-03
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 4:11 pm | |
| - Ocho Cinco wrote:
- So you'd do Eli, 1st and Shockey, for Palmer and Reggie?
if you could put like a 3rd or 4th rounder on yours too, it would be great | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 4:14 pm | |
| - shakostud05 wrote:
- Ocho Cinco wrote:
- So you'd do Eli, 1st and Shockey, for Palmer and Reggie?
if you could put like a 3rd or 4th rounder on yours too, it would be great I'll consider that. I like it, but not to sure. Palmer is a superstar. |
|
| |
shakostud05
Posts : 69 Join date : 2008-02-03
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 4:15 pm | |
| - Ocho Cinco wrote:
- shakostud05 wrote:
- Ocho Cinco wrote:
- So you'd do Eli, 1st and Shockey, for Palmer and Reggie?
if you could put like a 3rd or 4th rounder on yours too, it would be great I'll consider that. I like it, but not to sure. Palmer is a superstar. yeah i know thats why i like him, lol and trying to get him | |
|
| |
PR0SP3CT Trade Captain
Posts : 176 Join date : 2008-01-29 Age : 36 Location : Chicago,Illinois
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:16 pm | |
| - Ocho Cinco wrote:
- So you'd do Eli, 1st and Shockey, for Palmer and Reggie?
This trade is ridiculous should never get passed giants are overpaying like a mug. | |
|
| |
Ruskie89
Posts : 60 Join date : 2008-01-04
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:25 pm | |
| - PR0SP3CT wrote:
- Ocho Cinco wrote:
- So you'd do Eli, 1st and Shockey, for Palmer and Reggie?
This trade is ridiculous should never get passed giants are overpaying like a mug. Agreed. | |
|
| |
shakostud05
Posts : 69 Join date : 2008-02-03
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:28 pm | |
| - Ruskie89 wrote:
- PR0SP3CT wrote:
- Ocho Cinco wrote:
- So you'd do Eli, 1st and Shockey, for Palmer and Reggie?
This trade is ridiculous should never get passed giants are overpaying like a mug. Agreed. We are in the process of negotiation guys, he will be throwing in a 3rd round pick prolly | |
|
| |
PR0SP3CT Trade Captain
Posts : 176 Join date : 2008-01-29 Age : 36 Location : Chicago,Illinois
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:31 pm | |
| 3rd still doesn't even it out. | |
|
| |
Vhawk413
Posts : 234 Join date : 2008-02-02 Age : 37
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:35 pm | |
| - PR0SP3CT wrote:
- 3rd still doesn't even it out.
How not, Carson is a young 97 QB. That is valued much more than TE. A 97 QB and a 81 TE and a 3-4th for a 86 QB a 94 TE and a 1st | |
|
| |
titansalltheway
Posts : 79 Join date : 2008-01-29
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:36 pm | |
| i agree....i dont think the giants overpaying that that much, i think u guys r being to critical | |
|
| |
shakostud05
Posts : 69 Join date : 2008-02-03
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:37 pm | |
| - Vhawk413 wrote:
- PR0SP3CT wrote:
- 3rd still doesn't even it out.
How not, Carson is a young 97 QB. That is valued much more than TE. A 97 QB and a 81 TE and a 3-4th for a 86 QB a 94 TE and a 1st I AGREE!!! | |
|
| |
Vhawk413
Posts : 234 Join date : 2008-02-02 Age : 37
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:38 pm | |
| just because it is Ocho Cinco does not mean you guys should hate it right away | |
|
| |
Ruskie89
Posts : 60 Join date : 2008-01-04
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:41 pm | |
| - Vhawk413 wrote:
- just because it is Ocho Cinco does not mean you guys should hate it right away
LOL I hated the original Deal, 1st + Eli + Shockey was overkill for Carson + that other TE, I still wouldn't do it even with the 2nd. but he', thats me. Personally, take out the 1st and 3rd, have Giants throw in a 2nd instead, then it's even imo. But that's me. | |
|
| |
shakostud05
Posts : 69 Join date : 2008-02-03
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:44 pm | |
| - Ruskie89 wrote:
- Vhawk413 wrote:
- just because it is Ocho Cinco does not mean you guys should hate it right away
LOL
I hated the original Deal, 1st + Eli + Shockey was overkill for Carson + that other TE, I still wouldn't do it even with the 2nd. but he', thats me.
Personally, take out the 1st and 3rd, have Giants throw in a 2nd instead, then it's even imo. But that's me. I would if i had a 2nd round pick lol, but i dont | |
|
| |
PR0SP3CT Trade Captain
Posts : 176 Join date : 2008-01-29 Age : 36 Location : Chicago,Illinois
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:45 pm | |
| - Vhawk413 wrote:
- PR0SP3CT wrote:
- 3rd still doesn't even it out.
How not, Carson is a young 97 QB. That is valued much more than TE. A 97 QB and a 81 TE and a 3-4th for a 86 QB a 94 TE and a 1st Palmer 97 TE 81 3rd 75+ at most 4th 73+ at most for Shockey 94 1st round 80+ Manning 86 So it's like Eli for a 75+ rookie...Not even | |
|
| |
shakostud05
Posts : 69 Join date : 2008-02-03
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:47 pm | |
| - PR0SP3CT wrote:
- Vhawk413 wrote:
- PR0SP3CT wrote:
- 3rd still doesn't even it out.
How not, Carson is a young 97 QB. That is valued much more than TE. A 97 QB and a 81 TE and a 3-4th for a 86 QB a 94 TE and a 1st Palmer 97 TE 81 3rd 75+ at most 4th 73+ at most
for
Shockey 94 1st round 80+ Manning 86
So it's like Eli for a 75+ rookie...Not even I dont care how it looks, i dont believe that trade is that bad. i would like for it to happen | |
|
| |
PR0SP3CT Trade Captain
Posts : 176 Join date : 2008-01-29 Age : 36 Location : Chicago,Illinois
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:51 pm | |
| - shakostud05 wrote:
- PR0SP3CT wrote:
- Vhawk413 wrote:
- PR0SP3CT wrote:
- 3rd still doesn't even it out.
How not, Carson is a young 97 QB. That is valued much more than TE. A 97 QB and a 81 TE and a 3-4th for a 86 QB a 94 TE and a 1st Palmer 97 TE 81 3rd 75+ at most 4th 73+ at most
for
Shockey 94 1st round 80+ Manning 86
So it's like Eli for a 75+ rookie...Not even
I dont care how it looks, i dont believe that trade is that bad. i would like for it to happen This looks pretty much like the deal i'm going to make with the colts and Ocho would have none of it. I think it's unfair because Eli would be sub par on Bengals but Carson would Flourish... | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:57 pm | |
| - PR0SP3CT wrote:
- shakostud05 wrote:
- PR0SP3CT wrote:
- Vhawk413 wrote:
- PR0SP3CT wrote:
- 3rd still doesn't even it out.
How not, Carson is a young 97 QB. That is valued much more than TE. A 97 QB and a 81 TE and a 3-4th for a 86 QB a 94 TE and a 1st Palmer 97 TE 81 3rd 75+ at most 4th 73+ at most
for
Shockey 94 1st round 80+ Manning 86
So it's like Eli for a 75+ rookie...Not even
I dont care how it looks, i dont believe that trade is that bad. i would like for it to happen This looks pretty much like the deal i'm going to make with the colts and Ocho would have none of it. I think it's unfair because Eli would be sub par on Bengals but Carson would Flourish... Dude, i never said i was even gonna do it. I know this trade is crap, and I like Palmer to much to trade him for eli |
|
| |
shakostud05
Posts : 69 Join date : 2008-02-03
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning Wed Feb 06, 2008 4:29 pm | |
| - Ocho Cinco wrote:
- PR0SP3CT wrote:
- shakostud05 wrote:
- PR0SP3CT wrote:
- Vhawk413 wrote:
- PR0SP3CT wrote:
- 3rd still doesn't even it out.
How not, Carson is a young 97 QB. That is valued much more than TE. A 97 QB and a 81 TE and a 3-4th for a 86 QB a 94 TE and a 1st Palmer 97 TE 81 3rd 75+ at most 4th 73+ at most
for
Shockey 94 1st round 80+ Manning 86
So it's like Eli for a 75+ rookie...Not even
I dont care how it looks, i dont believe that trade is that bad. i would like for it to happen This looks pretty much like the deal i'm going to make with the colts and Ocho would have none of it. I think it's unfair because Eli would be sub par on Bengals but Carson would Flourish... Dude, i never said i was even gonna do it. I know this trade is crap, and I like Palmer to much to trade him for eli dude i never said we were trading, i jut put it up in terms for pepole to see it better, chill | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Eli Manning | |
| |
|
| |
| Eli Manning | |
|